Lets face it; social networking websites such as eHarmoney or Facebook are getting more popular every singe day. You begin to realize that we are starting to live in a very technologically advanced world when: one out of every five new relationships are founded off of an online dating service, and over fifty percent of all internet users, world-wide, are on Facebook. In fact, there are approximately seven billion people in the world, two million of which are Internet users, and 517,760,460 of them are Facebook users. That’s a bone chilling number. It’s a digital age and social networks are racking up numbers to an unbelievable amount. I don’t necessarily think that this is a bad thing because the younger generations are getting much more technological than any other existing or non-existing generation. Just because the world is changing doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a bad thing. I would personally rather use the word ‘advancing’ because we are abandoning old ways and making life much faster and easier by discovering new ways to communicate, have fun, conduct business, and even live a life.
Teachers seem to question the idea that advancing technology is putting a slight burden on the current educational system. Children today have a much shorter attention span and they require a different way to be taught. It is not the students who should be criticized; it’s the aging educational system that has been around for centuries. Books and paper, pencils and pens; these have been the same tools for a “proper” education since these things were invented. This just basically goes to show that if something remains concrete then it will die. Being born into a wireless society amplifies the theory that we need to make changes in order to keep up with the changes. Of course, it is not only the educational system that needs to, or has started to, make the necessary changes that adapt to the short attention spanned children now a days. Obviously online dating services are revolutionary ideas that greatly help the singles community. If one-fifth of all couples are brought together via eHarmony or Chemistry.com than these advances are making quite the positive impact.
As we become new users of different social networking sites, or even online video games, we re extending and expanding our identities. When someone creates a character in World of War craft I don’t believe that they are creating an alter ego. It is understood that the character that is created by someone is not really they as a person. The character is simply an avatar or a representation of the gamer. Therefore, it is an extension and expansion on an identity. Second Life is another example of creating avatar beings through game. Though, some users would not even call it a game, per se. Second Life is commonly used for business meetings or transactions. Some professionals have never even met each other in person because of distance or the lack of need to. This is a perfect example of how we are making changes to make certain situations easier and even cost efficient.
Despite the possibility of gaming addictions, the option of creating an avatar in World of War craft, or Second Life may be very appealing. When something gives you the options of being a king when you’re a peasant, who wouldn’t pass that opportunity up? Some may consider this a loss of personal space and is a surrender of ego. The way I see it, there is no such thing as personal space anymore. If someone wants to find out information about you then they are going to. The socially norm in our society is to be a user on some sort of social networking website so others can find out your relationship status, check out pictures of you, communicate via the particular website, and the list goes on and on. So maybe we are sacrificing our personal space but I feel that that would have been inevitable at some point in the near future.
I understand how people feel that all of these technological advances may seem unnatural or not right because it affects the way we’ve been doing things for such a long time. Change is difficult to cope with for those are who are unwilling to change. Pretty soon words like “collective organism” and “hyper-people”, referring to those more technologically advanced than others, will be obsolete. We, as human beings, are simply evolving. The same way monkeys evolve to use tools (of course, this comparison is exponentially less then the adaption to social networking. Like everything else, consumption in excess is a bad. So the moderate use of technology is not harmful and quite extraordinary. I look forward to see what the next revolutionary advancement will be and how we are going to be able to adapt.
Sources:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/10/three-stats-that-reveal-much-about-our-digital-culture/1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26734456/‘ial-Media-Web-2•O
http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-illusion-of-transparency-in-social-media.html